‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

NRC issues first U.S. construction permit for a BWRX-300 small modular reactor

151 points · 191 comments · papa-whisky

  1. throwaway2037 · · focus · HN ↗
    First, the Wiki page[1] for this reactor design has so little technical information. Frankly, it is a disappointing. For example, no where on the page does it explain that "300" means 300MW nameplate capacity. I had to Google for that info.

    The canary in the coal mine is already happening in Canada.

    From Wiki: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;BWRX-300#Canada" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;BWRX-300#Canada

        &gt; On December 1, 2021, Ontario Power Generation (OPG) selected the BWRX-300 SMR for use at the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station.  The final investment decision in May 2025 to proceed with the build of a BWRX-300 was based on a forecast cost of Canadian $7.7 billion (US$5.6 billion), with an estimated cost of Canadian $13.2 billion (US$9.6 billion) for the three further units on the same site.
    
    Yikes. Estimated cost of 15.2B USD for 1200MW of capacity. I am taking bets: How much will this project overrun its estimates? My guess: 25-50%. I don&#x27;t get it. Why are these better than just building one big reactor with 1000MW+ of capacity?

    Also, it looks like Darlington Nuclear Generating Station originally planned to build 4x 1200MV Advanced CANDU reactors. These were cancelled and replaced with a plan to build 4x BWRX-300 reactors.

    [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;BWRX-300" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;BWRX-300

    1. newsclues · · focus · HN ↗
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ontario.ca&#x2F;en&#x2F;release&#x2F;1006993&#x2F;ontario-delivers-darlington-refurbishment-project-ahead-of-schedule-and-under-budget" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ontario.ca&#x2F;en&#x2F;release&#x2F;1006993&#x2F;ontario-delivers-...

      Canadian nuclear industry is very good.

      1. api · · focus · HN ↗
        When I read about how CANDU (heavy water moderated reactor) works I started wondering why we ever build any other kind of large scale reactor.

        Runs on natural uranium. Can burn waste too, and plutonium, and even thorium (mixed in, not pure, but still). It’s like a flex fuel reactor. It’s very safe and reliable.

        Why do we bother with any other design? Except maybe fast breeders or fission fusion hybrids but those are whole new directions.

        1. throwaway2037 · · focus · HN ↗
          It can also be continually refuelled without shutting down.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.