‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

NRC issues first U.S. construction permit for a BWRX-300 small modular reactor

151 points · 191 comments · papa-whisky

  1. idontwantthis · · focus · HN ↗
    A nuclear power plant is essentially a coal power plant with free fuel. Today, if you literally built a coal power plant with free fuel it would not be cheaper than solar. My question: If you built a small modular coal power plant, would that be cheaper than solar? It necessarily has to be cheaper than nuclear.
    1. legulere · · focus · HN ↗
      Uranium mining, milling, conversion, enrichment and fuel fabrication are all not free.

      Because of protection from radioactive radiation, you have higher costs handling anything in a nuclear reactor compared to a coal plant. Then you have the issue of runaway nuclear reactions, hydrogen buildup etc.

      1. idontwantthis · · focus · HN ↗
        See reply above. That's my point.

        By "free" I mean that you need so little fuel over the lifetime of the reactor the cost is negligible compared to all the other extensive costs of building and managing the plant.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.