‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Livenerf: Has Opus 5.5 been nerfed yet?

922 points · 392 comments · bryan0

  1. jug · · focus · HN ↗
    We also have Nerf Bench:

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bridgebench.ai&#x2F;nerf-bench" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bridgebench.ai&#x2F;nerf-bench

    They test it on launch day, then benchmark it against that. A deviation of above 10% is considered a change. They&#x27;re currently tracking Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra.

    This bench famously detected a degradation of Opus 4.6 which Anthropic later blogged about. I personally think people sense nerfs more often than they happen and that it&#x27;s often about honeymoon effects.

    1. rplnt · · focus · HN ↗
      &gt; I personally think people sense nerfs more often than they happen and that it&#x27;s often about honeymoon effects.

      I believe in temporary nerfs. Operators reducing quality significantly to increase throughput for whatever reason (high demand?). Same session, model being completly incapable, and it being back to normal the next day. Experienced that with Anthropic models way too many times. Never on weekends, usually during US work days.

      It&#x27;s been a few months since I last recall this though, must have been pre-opus-5. And I know there are benchmarks for this as well, hence &quot;believe&quot;.

      1. jclardy · · focus · HN ↗
        I do remember times in the past where when I was up super early (4am EST) I would get super high quality results, then in mid afternoon EST it seemed to be degraded.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.