‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Livenerf: Has Opus 5.5 been nerfed yet?

922 points · 392 comments · bryan0

  1. johnfn · · focus · HN ↗
    "Nerf"ing models isn't real in the vast majority of reported cases. Benchmarks like this or the 100 other "let's see if nerfing is real" copies would have shown it by now if it was.

    I made a graphic to explain why people feel like the models get nerfed:

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;thesilenceturns&#x2F;status&#x2F;2103551351825543610" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;thesilenceturns&#x2F;status&#x2F;2103551351825543610

    The idea is that new models can handle up to a certain level of complexity, at which point they fall apart. Every new model can handle more complexity, so there&#x27;s a wonderful time upon release when you feel like you can do anything, only for you to hit the complexity ceiling a few days later when you saturate it. Rinse and repeat for the next model.

    1. winwang · · focus · HN ↗
      That&#x27;s a good observation, though I&#x27;d say here that two things could be true at the same time. But, I do personally believe that most of the reported nerfing is the case of your chart + latent evidence-less complaining. Honeymoon phases are real.
      1. khalic · · focus · HN ↗
        &gt; Honeymoon phases are real

        You can&#x27;t just dismiss something backed by careful measurements by throwing a truism at it. What is this honeymoon phase? Can you quantify it? If not, how are you sure it&#x27;s real?

        1. lxgr · · focus · HN ↗
          Where are these careful measurements? Are you 100% sure they don&#x27;t change the harness between runs and have a large enough sample size to be statistically significant?
          1. khalic · · focus · HN ↗
            All great questions you’re invited to ask the author. I was specifically responding to the “honeymoon phase” allegations and hand waving.
            1. lxgr · · focus · HN ↗
              Fair enough, but if you can&#x27;t answer them, you can arguably not use their work to support your point either.
              1. khalic · · focus · HN ↗
                I assume good faith
                1. lxgr · · focus · HN ↗
                  Methodological mistakes can and do happen despite good faith.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.