‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Livenerf: Has Opus 5.5 been nerfed yet?

922 points · 392 comments · bryan0

  1. jug · · focus · HN ↗
    We also have Nerf Bench:

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bridgebench.ai&#x2F;nerf-bench" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bridgebench.ai&#x2F;nerf-bench

    They test it on launch day, then benchmark it against that. A deviation of above 10% is considered a change. They&#x27;re currently tracking Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra.

    This bench famously detected a degradation of Opus 4.6 which Anthropic later blogged about. I personally think people sense nerfs more often than they happen and that it&#x27;s often about honeymoon effects.

    1. nullbio · · focus · HN ↗
      Do they use private benchmarks? Because if not, it could be selectively nerfed.

      I also wonder if cache could be used to throw these off as well, where it&#x27;s serving un-nerfed cache results for context windows that are identical to ones they&#x27;ve previously had for benchmark requests.

      Seems like the only way to do it well would be to have some randomness involved that couldn&#x27;t be cheated on - but you&#x27;d want to do it in a way that doesn&#x27;t throw out the benchmarks too much, so your results can be compared still.

      1. Gabrys1 · · focus · HN ↗
        Thankfully, we can now use AI to design a test that tests AI. And the AI company can use AI to detect the test and cheat. And we can then use AI to implement anti-cheat.

        All that energy wasted... could just drive a big V8 instead and make less money for the big tech

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.