AI needs $6T in annual revenue to justify data centre boom
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
AI needs $6T in annual revenue to justify data centre boom
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
bunderbunder · · focus · HN ↗
For example, the article suggests $1T from enterprise productivity tooling. A quick Google suggests the global enterprise productivity tooling market is only worth about $0.1T right now.
Do we really expect all the world’s corporations to suddenly up their annual spend by 1,000% on average? Why?
ItsMattyG · · focus · HN ↗
productivity tooling replaces employees
scottLobster · · focus · HN ↗
Hard to see how Google or Facebook keeps their advertising models in that environment. There aren't enough construction workers and data scientists to buy everything.
ItsMattyG · · focus · HN ↗
which yes, will completely destroy the consumer economy and social structures and current forms of governance
TheOtherHobbes · · focus · HN ↗
ItsMattyG · · focus · HN ↗
vconnor · · focus · HN ↗
MentalM · · focus · HN ↗
That is hardly will be of any consolation. AI will probably destroy capitalism, but not because it will replace some useless f.ucks from their useless computer jobs (most of them will perfectly fine find another more useful job, if only way less paid), but because with surveillance and totalitarian control that AI capable of, socialists like Stalin or Hitler will build resilient and durable society where no member will have any way for resisting.
scottLobster · · focus · HN ↗
MentalM · · focus · HN ↗
That is like one of the first steps to build the ultimate totalitarian regime. In the USSR bolsheviks were grate proponents of civilian weapons right until they have got power. And then civilian weapons were banned.
MentalM · · focus · HN ↗
There will be, when two third of the office workers will be replaced by AI.
It is astounding why so many people does not understand how consumer economy works. I think it is more a matter of the copium, because, well, it is generally hard to accept the truth that in five years you will have to haul bricks as a job, and the guy who used to put that bricks on one another and make three times less than you in your tech job now will be your new boss.
And advertising models in that environment? Why should something changed for it?