‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

GLM-5.3 and the spread of advanced cyber capabilities

254 points · 241 comments · Philpax

  1. CharlieDigital · · focus · HN ↗
    Anthropic has to use this wedge (and future ones) to move regulatory action against the Chinese models or their IPO is going to be really problematic.

    (Ironic, though, that I haven't heard of any Chinese models "escaping" which Anthropic and OpenAI both seem to have issues with...)

    Like Chinese electric cars, the American producers cannot compete without regulatory action. Yes, I understand that the Chinese government this and that in both the automotive and AI industries.

    But reality is what it is as a consumer: it's a cheaper product that's almost as good or better in some cases. And in the case of these open weight models: I can run it on my own infra and not give any data to anyone.

    1. jeffybefffy519 · · focus · HN ↗
      Didnt we try ban export of cryptography at one point, surely this is going to go very badly to try ban chinese models... its totally unenforceable.
      1. fy20 · · focus · HN ↗
        Depends what the end goal is. They could pull a card from the EU playbook, and through regulation effectively ban the hosting and use of open source models (read: uncertified models) by US companies.

        If the only choice you have is Anthropic or OpenAI, where will the money go?

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.