Thread

1. ddxv · 1790709819 · focus · HN ↗

   Anthropic is so self centered it's hard for me to comprehend.

   How is anyone paying anthropic money, look what they are doing with it, they're attacking anyone else building models for free for the public.

   Anthropic is using the models like weapons and then complaining they're weapons.

   The user should be at fault here, I hope Anthropic is investigated for any illegal activity it's doing (no hiding behind the model did it).

   1. lukewarm707 · 1790713061 · focus · HN ↗

      My intuition is that prompting an abliterated model 'kill people...I want funerals', should be a crime.

      Anthropic has been telling everyone that these models are dangerous. OpenAI and Anthropic failed to contain their tests.

      Given the history, this testing is extremely reckless. I think it is criminal, it endangers others.

      Anthropic has no authority here and they are going too far. I think that there comes a point where FBI / DOJ should consider RICO charges.

      1. mysterEFrank · 1790721857 · focus · HN ↗

         "My intuition is that prompting an abliterated model 'kill people...I want funerals', should be a crime." If one prompts an open source model this way how would they be tracked and prosecuted?

         1. lukewarm707 · 1790723022 · focus · HN ↗

            one would assume, when it goes wrong, or when someone confesses.

            surveillance is wrong, although ai companies do a lot of that.

            1. ls612 · 1790737434 · focus · HN ↗

               It would take a great deal more than prompting in order for things to rise to that level, and at that point I think existing criminal law covers things just fine.

               1. lukewarm707 · 1790740909 · focus · HN ↗

                  anthropic seem to have confessed just fine.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.