Thread

1. azuanrb · 1790719729 · focus · HN ↗

   So many negative comments here. Among my circle, it’s not uncommon for people to have multiple $200 accounts. This seems like it would make things easier for them by letting them use one account instead of juggling two or more.

   What they’re doing with billions of tokens every week, beats me. But these users absolutely do exist.

   1. alasano · 1790720238 · focus · HN ↗

      What do you mean? It's the fact that previously the 20x plan cost $200 (and is 10x now) and now 25x is $500.

      If it was a 50x $500 plan it would be a different story.

      1. bezier-curve · 1790722266 · focus · HN ↗

         For less than the cost of this plan, you can get ChatGPT Pro 200, Claude Max 5x, and Kimi Code. At least that's what I'm doing, and the model diversity does help with adversarial code review loops.

         1. alasano · 1790723041 · focus · HN ↗

            Agreed. In my testing yesterday GPT 6 Sol still beat Opus 5.5 on code review (of GPT written code in this case)

            6.1 will probably perform even better.

            Opus 5.5 is better in that regard than Fable 5.1 except for some bugs with more complexity which it was uniquely suited to.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.