‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Dots: Always-on agents

767 points · 647 comments · alvis

  1. tosh · · focus · HN ↗
    > excluding the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the UK

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;help.openai.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;articles&#x2F;20001530-getting-started-with-your-dot" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;help.openai.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;articles&#x2F;20001530-getting-started...

    1. verzali · · focus · HN ↗
      So yet another attempt to steal user data
      1. jvwww · · focus · HN ↗
        If only Europe could have produced a single frontier model company..
        1. bigyabai · · focus · HN ↗
          They don&#x27;t need to. Frontier labs are all unprofitable, it&#x27;s better value to redistribute China&#x27;s open-weights models.
          1. jvwww · · focus · HN ↗
            So why doesn&#x27;t Europe with it&#x27;s talent, money and institutions create an actually useful open source model rather than relying on China?

            The European attitude to technology is very strange to me. I&#x27;m very happy that I&#x27;ve been able to move to the US and leave it behind.

            1. f6v · · focus · HN ↗
              I kid you not, the research cloud for Danish universities is deploying a &quot;sovereign AI&quot;. Which means running GLM 5.3 on their Nvidia GPUs. All that while EU designates China a strategic threat.
              1. bigyabai · · focus · HN ↗
                That is unironically more sovereign than using any US-developed AI. GLM 5.3 is cutting-edge for cybersecurity tasks, while the US frontier forces KYC&#x2F;background checks for cyber capabilities.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.