‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Dots: Always-on agents

767 points · 647 comments · alvis

  1. mvkel · · focus · HN ↗
    My biggest frustration with the frontier AI companies isn&#x27;t what they&#x27;re announcing, but that the announced-thing that exists ~6 months later is severely nerfed to reduce compute spend. It doesn&#x27;t resemble the demo in any way. For example, this was what the 4o voice capability sounded like in 2024(!) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=vgYi3Wr7v_g" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=vgYi3Wr7v_g. What exists today pales in comparison.
    1. jasongi · · focus · HN ↗
      Pretty much. Always-on doesn&#x27;t scale as well as JIT access to a massive array of GPUs, because always-on means it&#x27;s always-using-memory - so you&#x27;re at least going to paying the cost of a minimum chips VPS for every Dot right?

      Maybe people are ok with that, but I feel like it would be nicer to just sell a cheap SBC like a raspberry pi that you can plug in (and unplug!) and just pay for the tokens used instead of having your data stored offsite and paying cloud prices.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.