‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Dots: Always-on agents

767 points · 647 comments · alvis

  1. johnfahey · · focus · HN ↗
    OpenAI won a lot of good favor for the generous Codex subscription and the efficiency of their models, but now that many people have switched over from Claude, they think they can leverage their position to peddle a stream of unnecessary products, and crack down on the generous limits[1] that brought everyone to Codex in the first place.

    Anthropic did the same thing. Earlier this year, Claude subs and Claude Code took off because of the subscription's incredible capability and value, then once they gained enough users, they started focusing on unnecessary products no one asked for (see Claude in Slack), and eventually lost their lead. After losing a bunch of customers to Codex subs they realized their mistake, and now they're shipping again.

    AI companies are bad at making software; they are good at making AI models. And that's about it.

    [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;thsottiaux&#x2F;status&#x2F;2104823812042940713" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;thsottiaux&#x2F;status&#x2F;2104823812042940713

    1. sumedh · · focus · HN ↗
      &gt; AI companies are bad at making software

      Isnt Chatgpt one of the most successful product of all time?

      1. RugnirViking · · focus · HN ↗
        something selling a lot doesn&#x27;t mean it&#x27;s good. Is McDonald&#x27;s good food? by some metrics of course it is. But if someone says McDonald&#x27;s makes bad food, I know what they mean
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.