The cost is going to be hard for many consumers to reconcile though. Free, Go, and Plus are probably the most popular consumer-facing plans, and Dots isn't available on any of those.
Who knows, maybe they think enterprise will pick up and run with Dots? Seems unlikely.
If they wanted to address that market, the play would be to make them relatively cheap first, then constantly raise the price. (See also: cable TV and ironically cable TV "alternatives")
cartersj · · focus · HN ↗
The cost is going to be hard for many consumers to reconcile though. Free, Go, and Plus are probably the most popular consumer-facing plans, and Dots isn't available on any of those.
Who knows, maybe they think enterprise will pick up and run with Dots? Seems unlikely.
rolosa · · focus · HN ↗
cousinbryce · · focus · HN ↗
lxgr · · focus · HN ↗
the_sleaze_ · · focus · HN ↗
The surprise is your idea of "relatively cheap" is fungible.
The service WILL be astounding though, I can't deny that.