‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Dots: Always-on agents

767 points · 647 comments · alvis

  1. jesse_dot_id · · focus · HN ↗
    The only reasons I can think for OpenAI and Meta to make their always-on agents cute little cartoons are all nefarious in nature.
    1. duplessitous · · focus · HN ↗
      Really, none? Was Microsoft nefarious when they deployed Clippy? I feel like there is an incredibly obvious reason that is not nefarious at all: the average consumer likes cute things
      1. jpnc · · focus · HN ↗
        > Was Microsoft nefarious when they deployed Clippy?

        Yes. It was predictive programming for getting (paper)clipped by AI.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.