‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Dots: Always-on agents

767 points · 647 comments · alvis

  1. dgellow · · focus · HN ↗
    I cannot fathom how much compute will be wasted with that type of always on agentic systems
    1. rglover · · focus · HN ↗
      Forget the compute, what about the energy (and other resource) requirements?
      1. dgellow · · focus · HN ↗
        Yes that’s what I meant. Compute requires energy, infrastructure, etc. easily more than 90% of it will be wasted, just LLMs processing meaningless data in cronjobs, for the few instances where there is something actually meaningful to report to the user
      2. matchbok3 · · focus · HN ↗
        Do you want to ban almonds because they require a lot of water? (1000x more AI?)
        1. dgellow · · focus · HN ↗
          I’m so suspicious of that exact claim being repeated everywhere since a few weeks, that really feels like a slogan astroturfed. It’s also fairly shallow analysis. Water is localized, you cannot do a meaningful comparison without taking in account the impact on specific water sources, an aggregate doesn’t give you any insight (other than having a slogan)
        2. rglover · · focus · HN ↗
          People aren't mortgaging their existence to get a piece of the almond market.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.