‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

GPT 6.1 Sol: Near-Astra intelligence for a fifth of the price

1066 points · 953 comments · crorella

  1. phpnode · · focus · HN ↗
    What's driving the increase in release cadence here? We seem to get new models every week or so now, is this RSI?
    1. system2 · · focus · HN ↗
      Chinese model pressure. Many of my SWE friends switched to Chinese models. I also use QWEN and GLM for many of the api requiring projects and dropped OpenAI and Anthropic. The only reason was the cost.

      EDIT: I love getting downvoted by openai and anthropic employees or their bots.

      1. thraway3837 · · focus · HN ↗
        I keep hearing about these Chinese models, but what exactly are you doing with the models and coding? I have a need to fully write code with full tool calling capabilities. Not just methods or functions. I want to be able to prompt a feature and it makes the JIRA ticket, and fully implements it and makes a PR. I don't want to babysit it or even read the code. Once it creates the PR, I want it to monitor it for any comments fro Copilot/security review and then fix it as necessary.

        Is that what the Chinese models are capable of? If so, how are you using them? API? Or is there an inference provider that is as fast as the big 2? What about the coding harness?

        1. senderista · · focus · HN ↗
          Sounds like your dream workflow could replace you with a PM?
        2. white_dragon88 · · focus · HN ↗

          [dead]

        3. system2 · · focus · HN ↗
          I am using the API only with them for now. But what you describe is nothing compared to Qwen or Mimo. These models are more capable than Opus in general and at a fraction of Opus's cost.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.