‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

DraftKings is using AI to behaviorally target chronic gamblers

570 points · 432 comments · paimapi

  1. tedivm · · focus · HN ↗
    ProPublica had one of their reports work with gambling addition experts to see how DraftKings would respond to someone presenting signs of a gambling problem. It's a hell of a read, and makes it clear that this company is full of people with absolutely no ethics whatsoever.

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.propublica.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;draftkings-sports-gambling-problem-vip-fanduel" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.propublica.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;draftkings-sports-gamblin...

    1. WheelsAtLarge · · focus · HN ↗
      People in companies that are a negative public good are by definition unethical. I&#x27;m not surprised by anything they do. The real problem is how we&#x27;ve let these companies infiltrate so much of our society so fast. I can&#x27;t consume any ad supported media without getting some ad about them. This company really defines the phrase &quot;money talks&quot;
      1. stronglikedan · · focus · HN ↗
        Many people enjoy gambling, and relatively few have a &quot;problem&quot;, so &quot;negative public good&quot; is doing a lot of work there. DraftKings may indeed by unethical, but that doesn&#x27;t mean that all or even most others are.
        1. frumplestlatz · · focus · HN ↗
          Gambling is extractive by definition, so I’m not particularly convinced that it’s not a problem for most of the people that “enjoy” it.
          1. davewritescode · · focus · HN ↗
            I have worked in gaming before so feel free to disregard my opinion but I truly do enjoy occasional betting and while its hard to argue it’s a net positive in my life it has never caused any financial hardship.

            Betting $25 on a game hijacks something in my brain that treats it like a fun problem to solve. It gets me interested in teams that I’d otherwise have no interest in. I’ve been betting on sports since the days of offshore betting sites and I can’t say I’ve ever lost or gained more than a few hundred dollars a year.

            I’m an adult and I enjoy being able to gamble on sports. It’s never been a problem for me and I suspect it never will be because of the way I do treat it, strictly something to be done for fun.

            I grew up in a household where family members also went to casinos and bet on sports responsibly so it was drilled into my head that you can’t ever beat the house and you should never bet what you couldn’t afford to lose.

            What business do you have telling me what I’m allowed to do with my own money for fun?

            1. TheOtherHobbes · · focus · HN ↗
              I&#x27;m someone who thinks corporations shouldn&#x27;t be free to prey lawlessly on emotional weaknesses.

              What business do you have telling everyone your personal experience justifies the horror others experience?

              If you couldn&#x27;t put down that $25, would you really not be able to find some other way to entertain yourself?

              1. davewritescode · · focus · HN ↗
                Making gambling illegal doesn’t make it just go away. My Grandfather used to bet on sports in 40s and 50s with a local bookie. The bookies even ran sweepstakes which resembled the modern day lotto which my great grandmother played every week.

                People like to gamble we need it legalized with reasonable regulations.

                What my big problem is that Wall St and the wider market seems to be trending to the least ethical companies (Kalshi, Polymarket, Bettr) are running unregulated gambling operations, providing 0 tax money to offset societal costs and are denying what they’re offering is gambling at all and even promising you can make money off it.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.