‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

DraftKings is using AI to behaviorally target chronic gamblers

570 points · 432 comments · paimapi

  1. tedivm · · focus · HN ↗
    ProPublica had one of their reports work with gambling addition experts to see how DraftKings would respond to someone presenting signs of a gambling problem. It's a hell of a read, and makes it clear that this company is full of people with absolutely no ethics whatsoever.

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.propublica.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;draftkings-sports-gambling-problem-vip-fanduel" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.propublica.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;draftkings-sports-gamblin...

    1. jimbo808 · · focus · HN ↗
      &gt; this company is full of people with absolutely no ethics whatsoever

      I believe this applies to any company which sells an inherently harmful, predatory, and addictive product or service

      1. qurren · · focus · HN ↗
        I feel like a much larger fraction of the economy is predatory than is made out to be in these gambling discourses. Examples:

        * FSA plans are designed to get you to gamble on how much medical expenses you will have; if you overestimate, you either lose the money or spend it on shit you otherwise wouldn&#x27;t buy; if you underestimate, you pay taxes on stuff you shouldn&#x27;t be paying taxes on. The healthy alternative would be: Cut the FSA, let people just tax deduct medical expenses at tax time, even small ones.

        * Extended warranty plans are baiting you to pay for something you are statistically unlikely to need. The healthy alternative would be: Just service things past warranty and charge a much more reasoanable price for it.

        * Insurances but co-insurances, deductibles, clauses: &quot;We&#x27;ll bait you into paying because you think we&#x27;ll pay but we&#x27;ll not actually pay because it says in the fine print&quot;

        * Trip protection: Asking you to gamble on the probability of a mishap, instead of just covering mishaps out of the box

        1. satyrnein · · focus · HN ↗
          In theory, insurance is the polar opposite of gambling. It&#x27;s supposed to be reducing your risk, while gambling increases it. Like &quot;do you want to gamble on that TV lasting, or do you want to buy the extended warranty?&quot; But in practice, the pricing is so terrible that it&#x27;s not worth it.
          1. ddq · · focus · HN ↗
            Clearly, the solution is gambling insurance!
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.