‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

America.gov

778 points · 742 comments · plesiv

  1. mellosouls · · focus · HN ↗
    I haven't tried this but in principle I think this sort of finding a needle in a haystack situation (finding the correct path to assistance in a government service) is one of the rare circumstances where a well-crafted chatbot can be genuinely useful rather than just irritating.
    1. dreadsword · · focus · HN ↗
      I've tried it - I've been playing around with a vibe coded application that crawls municipal websites, indexes and embeds, and then does rag retrieval. It came from the need to dig up specific information that's scattered across PDFs, multiple web pages, etc. - exactly as you described. AI does a decent job (w/ RAG) of synthesizing.

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;opencity.services&#x2F;chat&#x2F;winnipeg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;opencity.services&#x2F;chat&#x2F;winnipeg

      how do i report a noise complaint?

      It depends on the type of noise:

      - Loud party or people-related noise: call the Winnipeg Police Service non-emergency line at 204-986-6222.

      - Animals making unreasonably loud, unnecessary or excessive noises: report it through 3-1-1.

      - Mechanical equipment noise like furnaces or air conditioners, or noise from construction tools used by a company or resident: contact Community By-law Enforcement Services at 3-1-1.

      - Planned event noise: you may need a Noise Permit at no cost, but it is not for construction work and should be submitted at least four weeks before the event.

      The City also says noise-generating activities within 150 metres of a residential property are generally prohibited before 7 a.m. and after 9 p.m. on weekdays, and before 9 a.m. and after 9 p.m. on Saturdays, Sundays and statutory holidays.

      ------

      YMMV. A big part of the backend is categorizing hits and misses, with an eye to helping municipalities clean up conflicting information, fill obvious gaps, etc.

      1. cucumber3732842 · · focus · HN ↗
        This works fine when you&#x27;re sicking enforcement on someone and don&#x27;t really care, the bigger the blast radius the better, you just want to know who to call.

        Where it falls apart is &quot;how do I&quot; type questions because usually the legally factual answer is some huge complex state diagram where three local and four state agencies theoretically have discretionary jurisdiction over a your petty af project or business but the in practice answer is that some agency rubber stamps them all with minimal fuss. You can&#x27;t make the legally factual answer clear because the degree to which people support the status quo is largely predicated on ignorance, but you also can&#x27;t come out and say in writing that you have a policy of rubber stamping boring stuff.

        Basically the same reasons that all but the most minor and narrowly targeted attempts at permitting reform fail.

        The thought is nice but in reality you&#x27;re basically asking the government to give up power and it takes obscene amounts of political capital to force that to happen in most cases.

        1. iamnothere · · focus · HN ↗
          I forgot about this problem, this is so true, but I will say that maybe surfacing these contradictions is the first step in fixing them.

          Especially at the local level, we have a huge problem with opaque bureaucracy whose only function is to privilege incumbents (such as developers with connections) and make life difficult for anyone doing something unusual (even if it technically complies with all legal requirements).

          This is where people usually point out POSIWID[0], but ideally government agencies should stick to what it says on the law&#x2F;regulation, not have some hidden purpose.

          [0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_purpose_of_a_system_is_what_it_does" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_purpose_of_a_system_is_wha...

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.