‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Backblaze drive stats for Q2 2026

307 points · 113 comments · HieronymusBosch

  1. realityfactchex · · focus · HN ↗
    In 2013 Backblaze saw ~14% avg failure rate at 3 years 3 months. Drive useful life: 4 years, roughly.

    In 2021, Backblaze saw ~14% failure rate at 7 years 9 months. Drive useful life: about 6 years.

    That gave us what was a stable-seeming, old "replace drives at 5 years, or you're getting risky" rule of thumb (unless you prefer to replace on failure, of course).

    In 2025, Backblaze saw ~5% failure rate at 10 years 3 months. Drive useful life: ~10 years, roughly!

    Thanks for all the HDD improvements, industry!

    1. nalekberov · · focus · HN ↗
      Meanwhile my 2.5" HDDs are still alive after more than 10 years. Sure they are not actively used, but still remarkable.
      1. tete · · focus · HN ↗
        I think that's because there is differences in comparison. When an HDD reached 5 (or X) years it's much more likely to live to 10 (or y) years than one that died at 2 (or Z) years already. ;)

        There is both the mathematical truth to it, but also the physical/chemical one. If something eg. deformed or had a slight manufacturing mistake the wear will be quicker. If everything works perfectly and eg. there are little vibrations (can be everything from earthquake to noise) then HDDs also tend to live longer and run faster. Of course the shipping process also can take its toll and vary greatly.

        I think in the world of computers it's all to easy to forget that things largely aren't binary and "logically perfect". Even with advancements in manufacturing and materials drives are physical things in the real world influenced by many things inside and outside of the manufacturer's and user's control.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.