‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Backblaze drive stats for Q2 2026

307 points · 113 comments · HieronymusBosch

  1. reenorap · · focus · HN ↗
    Hard drives.... I remember those things... didn't I used to use them before the Great HDD and SSD Extinction of 2025-2026?

    Seriously, I had to replace 2 hard drives in my NAS this year like a bad luck lottery and my hard drives have doubled in price. I was terrified that my NVMe was failing as well.

    1. KronisLV · · focus · HN ↗
      Thankfully for many folks there's the option of going either with whitelabel or recertified drives!

      I think for the folks in the US this was a site that works: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goharddrive.com&#x2F;default.php" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goharddrive.com&#x2F;default.php

      Whereas for those in the EU there&#x27;s this: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;datablocks.dev&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;datablocks.dev&#x2F;

      For the second link, you&#x27;ll have to ignore the horribly tasteless AI slop image for the site background (someone should e-mail them about it or something), the site itself is legit, bought some drives from them: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.kronis.dev&#x2F;blog&#x2F;buying-some-drives-from-datablocks&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.kronis.dev&#x2F;blog&#x2F;buying-some-drives-from-datablo...

      1. nalekberov · · focus · HN ↗
        Never buy a recertified drive, talking from my own experience, my recertified Seagate Exos X16 failed exactly after a year. They are very cheap for a reason.

        It failed for a reason before, so it will likely fail again before the end of its usual lifecycle.

        1. fc417fc802 · · focus · HN ↗
          This has not been my experience at all. All of my NAS drives are recertified enterprise models. I&#x27;ve never had one fail. (But then I&#x27;ve only had a single spinning disk fail on me ever. Generally I retire them because they become too small to justify occupying a slot. Slots are scarce.)
          1. nalekberov · · focus · HN ↗
            How long have they been spinning 24&#x2F;7?

            idk, it was such a traumatic experience for me that I decided to pass on recertified HDDs.

            1. fc417fc802 · · focus · HN ↗
              A really long time (at least by residential standards). Close to 24&#x2F;7 for many years.

              If a single HDD failing is traumatic then you&#x27;re doing something wrong. At absolute minimum you should be in raid1. Backups should amount to snapshots that can be restored in a single step.

              1. nalekberov · · focus · HN ↗
                &gt; If a single HDD failing is traumatic then you&#x27;re doing something wrong. At absolute minimum you should be in raid1. Backups should amount to snapshots that can be restored in a single step.

                I wasn&#x27;t storing anything important on it anyway, mostly movies ripped from Blu-rays. So its failure wasn&#x27;t traumatic. However I expected it to last at least three years, but it died after exactly 365 days of use. The seller refused to send a replacement, and legally speaking, they were in the right.

        2. noAnswer · · focus · HN ↗
          Melodramatic mutch? The first new IDE HDD I ever bought died within a week. The first new USB HDD I ever bought was dead on arrival. My first server SSD became read only after a year.

          Better telling everyone not to buy this things. &#x2F;s

          1. nalekberov · · focus · HN ↗
            Thanks for the textbook definition of a logical fallacy, buddy. (Your idiocy has no limits)
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.