‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

1 in 8 cancer cases worldwide are caused by infections, study finds

296 points · 158 comments · colinprince

  1. toasty228 · · focus · HN ↗
    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.oatext.com&#x2F;which-environment-makes-cancer.php" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.oatext.com&#x2F;which-environment-makes-cancer.php

    Always a good read, most cancers are environmental, and most of these are caused by obesity, bad diet and smoking&#x2F;drinking, fix these four things in your life and you reduce your chances of getting cancer by 50%+

    1. mapontosevenths · · focus · HN ↗
      I don&#x27;t think that anything you said is wrong, but I also think it&#x27;s important to note that on a long enough timeline your odds of getting cancer are 100% regardless of the way you live.Most people just don&#x27;t live that long.

      The things you mention here make it happen sooner, but no amount of healthy living lowers your risk to zero and I think that&#x27;s important to note when you say things like &quot;cancer is caused by&quot;.

      Cancer is caused by math. This stuff just steepens the slope.

      1. toasty228 · · focus · HN ↗
        It&#x27;s also important to note that getting a random cancer at 80+ sucks orders of magnitude less than going out at 45 from colon or throat cancer in every measurable metrics you can come up.
        1. devmor · · focus · HN ↗
          I would heavily disagree with this - it depends entirely on the cancer you get. If it&#x27;s something slow growing that would take a decade plus to kill you, sure - just trying to treat it would be worse than letting it ride.

          But my father died of cancer nearing age 80, (most likely mesothelioma, though we didn&#x27;t do heavy tests as it was discovered late), and it was incredibly painful and miserable for him. He had fast growing tumors in his ribs, forcing bone to spike out and hit his lungs, the tumors that grew in his lungs caused constant pneumonia and kept leaving him unable to get enough oxygen to his brain to communicate for hours at a time.

          1. ahelwer · · focus · HN ↗
            Unfortunately a lot of us will die in comparable ways if we are lucky enough to get that old. My grandmother was healthy &amp; mentally with it until stroking out in her garden one day at the age of 90. That is the best any of us can hope for and the reality will almost certainly be far more painful and prolonged.
            1. devmor · · focus · HN ↗
              No, I don&#x27;t think most people die in excruciating pain.
              1. overtone1000 · · focus · HN ↗
                It depends on mechanism, but many cancer patients do deal with a great deal of pain, especially near the end of the disease process. I am sorry for your experience. It is not uncommon.
                1. HoldOnAMinute · · focus · HN ↗
                  It is inhumane that we don&#x27;t offer every possible option to those who are suffering.
                  1. overtone1000 · · focus · HN ↗
                    It is unfortunately a complicated situation that often doesn&#x27;t have a perfect solution. Without trying to cover every possibl nuance, I&#x27;ll just say that many end-stage patients have pain so refractory that sufficient doses of pain medication are effectively lethal. This is usually offered, but obviously not everyone accepts.

                    The truly sad cases are those in which the patient no longer has decision-making capacity and it falls on a family member to make such decisions. When you aren&#x27;t the one experiencing the pain, it&#x27;s much harder to weigh that decision rationally. This is why so many providers push patients to establish legal documentation of their end-of-life wishes.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.