‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

500k facial scans at UK stations yield no arrests, 1 false positive

518 points · 305 comments · ilamont

  1. jwally · · focus · HN ↗
    I was thinking about this with flock cameras the other day...what's our actual ROI? Was the world horrible before and these initiatives are going to close a monster crime gap or is this just a giant fishing expedition ... just because?
    1. pj_mukh · · focus · HN ↗
      Can we cut to the bone a little bit? The recent crime panics are not about a partner assaulting their live-in partner or a random home burglary. There is no real "ROI" to be had.

      It's purely about the unease of living in chaotic cities, the random stabbings, the shoplifting, the visible homelessness etc. Flock is the stopgap here.

      Partly the "feeling" of chaos is just that, a feeling, driven significantly by algorithmic feeds feeding us every random crime from around the country 24/7. Husband murders wife in a murderous rage? No one hear's about it. Mentally ill man murders a woman on the train in a Tier 2 city, immediate nationwide breaking news.

      The other part though is a real dissolution in how we take care of our mentally ill. Complex topic [1].

      I think complaining about Flock is complaining about the symptom. Today we dogpile on Flock to get it cancelled, tomorrow the public will reach for something else. We have to fix the underlying disease, which is a combination of the two factors above.

      [1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;time.com&#x2F;6265241&#x2F;america-care-of-mentally-ill-people&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;time.com&#x2F;6265241&#x2F;america-care-of-mentally-ill-people...

      1. altacc · · focus · HN ↗
        In the UK there is a yearly survey regarding crime and I&#x27;ve not read it for a few years (I&#x27;ve emigrated) but a regular theme used to be that people interviewed personally felt safe and weren&#x27;t likely to be victims of crime but thought everyone else in the country was less safe and everywhere they didn&#x27;t live had higher crime than it did.

        The public perception of crime is persistently incorrect for many if not most people and this incorrect, emotional rather than evidence-based view of the world is unfortunately what drives political pressure.

        1. okwhateverdude · · focus · HN ↗
          &gt; The public perception of crime is persistently incorrect for many if not most people and this incorrect, emotional rather than evidence-based view of the world is unfortunately what drives political pressure.

          Some of this is definitely the BBC&#x27;s fault. I happened to be over at a friend&#x27;s one morning and he had it on. It smelt just like right-wing media in the US with big stories on mega important topics like... shoplifting. The crime reporting just felt really amplified up.

          1. dannyw · · focus · HN ↗
            The BBC of today is far from what it was a decade ago. So much trust and credibility has been lost.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.