Thread

New Cyber-OSINT model released

53 points · 16 comments · soltanov

Loading the complete thread in the background. This saved snapshot is available now. Refresh

hndhyc0bdt · 1790677954 · focus · HN ↗
Having done a fair bit of infra attribution work, the thing I'd want to know is how it handles stale data. Pivoting on certs and WHOIS is easy, knowing a host moved three months ago is the hard part.
1. Retr0id · 1790679753 · focus · HN ↗
  Are you an LLM?
sunbum · 1790679263 · focus · HN ↗
Why exactly is an specific model needed for this? Also this is useless without a proper harness.
1. alienbaby · 1790681761 · focus · HN ↗
  better local performance from a fine tuned model, don't need to use a cloud instance? Avoids guardrails on cloud instances? and yes, you can plug the model into your own harness?
ironqcold · 1790682206 · focus · HN ↗
6,500 instructions is a small training set, so I'd want to see how it performs on unseen indicators
snapplebobapple · 1790683656 · focus · HN ↗
Can someone poat the link to the actual project for those of us who refuse to install the x app or sugn up please?
1. ImNawre · 1790684132 · focus · HN ↗
  <a href="https://huggingface.co/terrorswift/REDCELL-26B-A4B-OSINT-Cyber-APEX-GGUF" rel="nofollow">https://huggingface.co/terrorswift/REDCELL-26B-A4B-OSINT-Cyb...
2. fearmerchant · 1790693932 · focus · HN ↗
  You might consider making a sock puppet account for these situations instead of constantly relying on everyone else.
  1. dombiscoff · 1790695284 · focus · HN ↗
    [flagged]
    dang · 1790705362 · focus · HN ↗
    Please don't cross into personal attack, regardless of whether someone is being annoying or you feel they are. We're trying for something different here.
    <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html">https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
  2. halJordan · 1790712924 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
3. WalterGR · 1790696338 · focus · HN ↗
  [delayed]
  1. halJordan · 1790712836 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
AlanYx · 1790688429 · focus · HN ↗
What does "Admiralty source grading" mean in this context?
1. kjs3 · 1790689095 · focus · HN ↗
  Non-english speaker ran "Military grade sources" or some such through a not-very-good translator?
  1. nyc_data_geek1 · 1790690120 · focus · HN ↗
    <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiralty_code" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiralty_code
    Isn't conversation on this forum supposed to be more informed and curious? Why are you posting idle speculation?
    kjs3 · 1790695179 · focus · HN ↗
    I enjoy saying things that trigger condescending pedants with too much time and angst on their hands who think they're the self appointed voice of 'acceptability' on the forum.
    Found one.
2. entropyie · 1790689175 · focus · HN ↗
  It's a standard for accessing confidence and reliability of a source. See admiralty code
1970-01-01 · 1790688559 · focus · HN ↗
Jargon so thick you need a knife

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.