Thread

1. gaigalas · 1790728766 · focus · HN ↗

   The new planes (F-35) were supposed to supersede interceptors like the SR-71 (that's their multirole goal). If it can't, this is an embarrassment.

   1. flkiwi · 1790728918 · focus · HN ↗

      What? The SR-71 was a strategic reconnaissance aircraft. It was not, and never was, an interceptor. And the F-35 was never tasked with replacing an interceptor, but is a slow-ish multirole aircraft with a heavy emphasis on strike capability. And the USAF hasn't had an "interceptor" in decades (single mission, short range, high speed, point defense aircraft).

      1. gaigalas · 1790731725 · focus · HN ↗

         Makes sense, the SR-71 has never intersected with any interceptor program. And the F-35 is perfect for its role (whatever it is) which is very much relevant for the current theaters. There is no embarrassment whatsoever.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.