‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Show HN: Raven – The harness of harnesses, built for RSI

55 points · 51 comments · cyfyifanchen

  1. arminluschin · · focus · HN ↗
    This looks similar to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paseo.sh&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paseo.sh&#x2F;, if I understand correctly. I’ve recently tried it and liked it a lot. Would be nice to see a comparison. When’s the harness of harnesses of harnesses coming?
    1. jfaat · · focus · HN ↗
      I&#x27;m using paseo heavily too. The main differences here seem to be around how opinionated Raven&#x27;s orchestration is. They&#x27;re providing agents, workflows, memory, skills, etc. Paseo gives you some orchestration tools but it&#x27;s mostly letting the &#x27;native&#x27; harnesses do the work. For my workflow, I&#x27;m interested in some of what they&#x27;re doing here but I&#x27;m not in buying into their whole system (markdown for memory and calling it RSI, as someone else called out, is not doing it for me). The follow up actions and meta-harness tuning look pretty cool.

      They also don&#x27;t ship an app which is one of the best parts of paseo. Then again Paseo&#x27;s perf leaves a lot to be desired.

      1. mistercheese · · focus · HN ↗
        Yeah I actually don’t even use Paseo’s orchestration much. I’m mostly using Paseo because I want to use Anthropic and OpenAI’s native harnesses for their respective models, but OpenCode for others, with a good remote mobile app experience when I want to check in on agent work or steer things away from my computer.

        I haven’t found a better OpenCode remote mobile app experience. If OpenCode or Pi makes one, I might just move to that.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.