Thread

Loading the complete thread in the background. This saved snapshot is available now. Refresh

1. girvo · 1790672274 · focus · HN ↗

   I’ve been playing with Qwen 3.8 Flash Next uncensored (using the Heretic v2 method) for security exploration, and have been quite impressed, so I’m not surprised to see it near or at the top here. But also it’s a far more powerful base model, so that shouldn’t be too surprising either.

   1. prettyblocks · 1790688528 · focus · HN ↗

      The abliterated qwen3.8 has been really good too

      1. halJordan · 1790713070 · focus · HN ↗

         [delayed]
2. lmc · 1790672444 · focus · HN ↗

   If the author is looking - please add details to the sources.

   Also, the graduated colour scheme works only on the first plot, it's misleading on the others.

3. flipping_beacon · 1790672870 · focus · HN ↗

   Would have been better with something else other than the gradient colour scheme

   1. b112 · 1790672996 · focus · HN ↗

      Indeed... the graphs are basically just annoying to look at. Can't understand the decision on that.
4. bede · 1790675867 · focus · HN ↗

   Please use a categorical colour palette when visualising data like these
5. soltanov · 1790676049 · focus · HN ↗

   Author: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;C0d3Cr4zy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;C0d3Cr4zy
6. PinkaDunka · 1790676298 · focus · HN ↗

   [delayed]
7. xnorswap · 1790676567 · focus · HN ↗

   Sometimes a table is more clear than a chart.
8. BrawnyBadger53 · 1790677230 · focus · HN ↗

   I can only assume this whole post is meant to be an ad for the cyber frost model? The charts being unreadable such that only cyber frost is identifiable, benchmarks being chosen to mostly support it, and the model being only 2 days old all makes me rather suspect.
9. Incipient · 1790686224 · focus · HN ↗

   Has anyone tried these security models for finding bugs from the outside vs say Fable reviewing code for bugs on the inside?

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.