‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve Falls to Lowest Level Since 1982

182 points · 234 comments · thelastgallon

  1. brightball · · focus · HN ↗
    Chart of strategic reserve levels since 1982, for context

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.macromicro.me&#x2F;charts&#x2F;41674&#x2F;us-strategic-petroleum-reserve" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.macromicro.me&#x2F;charts&#x2F;41674&#x2F;us-strategic-petroleum...

    1. pstuart · · focus · HN ↗
      It looks like it started to plummet in April 2022, which was on Biden&#x27;s watch (disclaimer: I voted for him). It apparently was in response to supply chain shocks spiking oil prices due to the start of the war in Ukraine.

      Having the AI summarize the pros and cons of that action has valid points on both sides. But in his defense, that particular war was not of our doing, unlike the current war with Iran which was initiated impulsively.

      1. partiallypro · · focus · HN ↗
        &gt; that particular war was not of our doing

        Well... arguably it is partially our doing. Not for the reason&#x27;s Tucker Carlson &amp; Russia say, but that Obama and later Biden totally sat on their laurels after the Crimean invasion, totally paralyzed by fear of escalation and political fallout.

        1. jcranmer · · focus · HN ↗
          In 2014, there was no political will in the US political system to do anything--witness Obama drawing the red line in Syria over the use of chemical weapons, and after Assad used them, Congress said &quot;fuck off, we don&#x27;t want to do anything.&quot; Given that Crimea was by far the most Russophile portion of Ukraine (it only veeeery barely voted to support Ukrainian independence in the Ukrainian independence referendum), it was much more difficult to build a case for any sort of intervention there than it would be after Syrian war crimes, and the latter wasn&#x27;t enough to gain sufficient political will.

          On top of that, 2014 is the 100th anniversary of the start of World War I, which means that all of the foreign policy people had been brushing up on their histories of World War I and the causes of said war, which is of course the ur-example of &quot;random event escalates to every great power at war with each other.&quot; I definitely felt like a lone voice pointing out that I was getting more World War II vibes, with Putin acting like Hitler: &quot;I just want a little bit of X, it&#x27;s the last thing I&#x27;ll ask for, I promise!&quot;

          Also, probably more important than the US reaction here is the German reaction, and Germany was in full Russian appeasement mode really right up until Russian tanks were literally rolling across the border in 2022.

          1. ifwinterco · · focus · HN ↗
            Crimea isn&#x27;t just Russophilic, the majority of the population even before 2014 were ethnic Russians, the majority language was Russian, and it was part of Russia until 1954.

            People who make a big point about &quot;Crimea is Ukraine!&quot; are either ignorant or ideological, objectively it&#x27;s at best debatable.

            (And really, there should be no slavs there at all and it should be given back to the Tatars, if anyone really wants to get into the morals...)

            1. expedition32 · · focus · HN ↗
              Countries can have different ethnicities, political parties and religions.

              But if Ukraine became prosperous and democratic it would make Putin look bad. Think West Germany against East Germany.

              1. ifwinterco · · focus · HN ↗
                Yes but that&#x27;s sort of a different argument.

                My point is the 1991 borders are somewhat arbitrary: they were originally internal administrative divisions inside a larger centralised state.

                They don&#x27;t necessarily represent a natural long term international border, and attaching huge moral significance to the specific strokes of a Soviet bureaucrat&#x27;s pen is strange

                1. Paradigma11 · · focus · HN ↗
                  Many borders are arbitrary. The moral significance results when nations go full 1900 with land grabbing invasion and all that psuedohistorical ethnic bullshit. I urge you to read the soviet propaganda for the winter war or that of the nazis and the Sudetendeutschen. It is not distinguishable from the drivel that Putin spouts.
                  1. [deleted] · · focus · HN ↗

                    [deleted]

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.