‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Who should be held accountable when an AI Agent (accidentally) acts maliciously?

37 points · 99 comments · Greenpants

  1. ngetchell · · focus · HN ↗
    Both the operator of the AI agent and whomever released it. I'm sure the user agreement that companies agree to would shift the blame onto the operator but I feel that both should be held accountable.

    This really is just a tool and courts should treat it as such.

    1. user43928 · · focus · HN ↗
      I'm going to propose the opposite: no one should be held accountable for an AI agent that acts maliciously by accident.
      1. [deleted] · · focus · HN ↗

        [deleted]

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.