‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Flock Wants the Most Detailed Map of Its Surveillance Cameras Taken Offline

205 points · 101 comments · bookofjoe

  1. adolph · · focus · HN ↗
    Clickbait. The website proprietor received a 3rd party trademark infringement complaint. If people in the company would prefer the map to be offline, they are taking a very roundabout way of accomplishing it.

      On Thursday, Michael was notified that Doppel, which describes itself as an “AI-native social engineering defense platfom,” filed a trademark infringement complaint regarding his site, claiming to be working on Flock’s behalf. Doppel says that the site is using the trademark “FLOCK SAFETY” without authorization, which “may cause customer confusion / harm.” Doppel requested the site be taken down.
    1. to11mtm · · focus · HN ↗
      Using a 3rd party trademark enforcement company is an excellent way to minimize PR fallout for a company wanting to silence transparency around (or criticism of) a company.

      Let's be real here; Would Doppel give any fucks about trying to do a trademark request if Flock wasn't paying them money?

      I look forward to trying to understand your reasoning.

      1. adolph · · focus · HN ↗
        3rd party copyright enforcement goes out an spams anything they think will get their stats up. I doubt anyone would know about this site if the security researcher behind it wasn't able to make some press with "I got a trademark notice!" The claim is "Flock Wants ..." and the evidence is "someone got a trademark C&D."
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.