‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

First Steps of the PLC Organization – Independent Public Ledger of Credentials

56 points · 25 comments · embedding-shape

  1. ACCount39 · · focus · HN ↗
    This might be one of the closest things I've seen to actually being able to own your account - instead of having it not just owned by a second party in every way that matters, but also beholden to a third party via an e-mail or a phone number you can't possibly own in any meaningful way.

    That's pretty important in a world where the likes of Google can and will just reject your attempt to log in with a valid password on the grounds of "we don't like you", and force you to "confirm" yourself using a phone number that's defunct since 2009.

    The issue is, as often is the case, adoption.

    1. verdverm · · focus · HN ↗
      did:web is closer to owning your own identity, this is a central database controlled by an organization

      The PLC makes it easy for Bluesky to be a custodian and onboard new users

      1. cmjs · · focus · HN ↗
        Nobody owns a domain name. You rent it, subject to the whims of the registry. Miss a single payment and you loose it forever. Even if you always pay up on time, despite price rises etc, they can still decide to take it away: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;neil.fraser.name&#x2F;news&#x2F;2026&#x2F;09&#x2F;03&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;neil.fraser.name&#x2F;news&#x2F;2026&#x2F;09&#x2F;03&#x2F;

        PLC is imperfect, like every solution to identity so far, but it&#x27;s a lot better (in terms of ownership &#x2F; control of your own ID) than DNS.

        1. idiotsecant · · focus · HN ↗
          I think ENS basically solved this already. Turns out nobody really cares about the problem much.
          1. someonebaggy · · focus · HN ↗
            Permanent human-readable names are subject to squatting. Who owns microsoft.eth? I bet it&#x27;s not Microsoft.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.