Cool project, but I'd really suggest looking at the UI.
The text is too small and it's way too dense with information in general. Considering how simple this product is to use, it's kinda crazy that I have to scroll through over a page length of (mostly useless, AI-generated) information before getting to the actual interface.
Also what is going on with the footer (why does it link back to the site itself, why is it telling me to "serve over HTTP").
I've thought some more about your feedback, since other replies gave the same feedback. At the same time, I didn't want to remove the "mostly useless" information since clearly it was useful for a lot of people! The submission was on the front page of HN (often in the #3 or #4 spot) for 12 hours and last I checked generated more than 300,000 requests from 36,000 unique IP's (on an ordinary 2-day period there are around 1,600 unique IP's) and people downloaded 600 GB of models, including 8.5k downloads initiated for the first model (3,000 of which were completed and 5.5k of which did not wait for it to complete, since download was a little slow due to the high number of concurrent users.)
So, clearly, the presentation format resonated with a lot of people. Therefore, I kept the presentation but put a tl;dr in enormous can't-miss-it shimmering font at the top. I marked all the "dense information" you mentioned as "Optional reading" (it's a lab after all, there should be a reading for it) and increased the font size.
I removed the parts of the footer that you said didn't make sense. The page isn't on the front page anymore so I don't know if people would like the changes or not, but I've changed the page layout in response to your feedback.
I should preface this by saying it is a cool demo. I love SLMs and I think they will become even more popular in the future as capability per byte improves and hardware improves to support my bytes.
So I think this post performed well in spite of the annoying parts, not because of it.
> I didn't want to remove the "mostly useless" information since clearly it was useful for a lot of people
The information was not “clearly” useful. It had obviously incorrect information that no one even noticed. In my opinion that is strong evidence for the opposite conclusion, that people ignored it because it was noise.
Why would people ignore this information? Demos are a show, don’t tell thing. For example, you don’t have to tell people that the latency is low. They should be able to see it from the demo.
demibabs · · focus · HN ↗
The text is too small and it's way too dense with information in general. Considering how simple this product is to use, it's kinda crazy that I have to scroll through over a page length of (mostly useless, AI-generated) information before getting to the actual interface.
Also what is going on with the footer (why does it link back to the site itself, why is it telling me to "serve over HTTP").
logicallee · · focus · HN ↗
So, clearly, the presentation format resonated with a lot of people. Therefore, I kept the presentation but put a tl;dr in enormous can't-miss-it shimmering font at the top. I marked all the "dense information" you mentioned as "Optional reading" (it's a lab after all, there should be a reading for it) and increased the font size.
I removed the parts of the footer that you said didn't make sense. The page isn't on the front page anymore so I don't know if people would like the changes or not, but I've changed the page layout in response to your feedback.
janalsncm · · focus · HN ↗
So I think this post performed well in spite of the annoying parts, not because of it.
> I didn't want to remove the "mostly useless" information since clearly it was useful for a lot of people
The information was not “clearly” useful. It had obviously incorrect information that no one even noticed. In my opinion that is strong evidence for the opposite conclusion, that people ignored it because it was noise.
Why would people ignore this information? Demos are a show, don’t tell thing. For example, you don’t have to tell people that the latency is low. They should be able to see it from the demo.