‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

So long Google, and thanks for all the nudes

264 points · 114 comments · speckx

  1. thih9 · · focus · HN ↗
    > it was rejected. They attached a nsfw screenshot of some unidentified app.

    I don’t doubt the author, at the same time this is a serious accusation with no details and little context.

    This could have been presented in a more organized way, with timelines and redacted content.

    Part of the problem is Google not being transparent, having more transparency could help.

    1. fooqux · · focus · HN ↗
      Anybody who's ever tried to get through their review process can attest that the article writer's experience is far from outside the norm.

      Although I must admit I've never gotten nudes from them. Up your game, Google.

      1. ajross · · focus · HN ↗
        > Anybody who's ever tried to get through their review process can attest that the article writer's experience is far from outside the norm.

        This is an argumentum ad populum fallacy. "Everybody Knows" this kind of thing is true, ergo you should believe the example here without evidence.

        It's also kinda ridiculous in context. I mean, no, there are no cases in the literature where Google has rejected an app due to misidentification with NFSW content and then sent screenshots of said content as part of the review. Even not in combination I don't think. Like, has either situation every been documented on its own? "Far from outside the norm" indeed.

        1. handoflixue · · focus · HN ↗
          > This is an argumentum ad populum fallacy. "Everybody Knows" this kind of thing is true, ergo you should believe the example here without evidence.

          A much more charitable reading would be something like: Numerous people have all made this complaint, therefore the broader point is probably solid, even if this particular example might not be iron-clad evidence on it's own.

          I've certainly heard enough similar stories that I don't have much trouble doubting this one, although I'd hardly consider any one story super-convincing on it's own

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.