> it was rejected. They attached a nsfw screenshot of some unidentified app.I don’t doubt the author, at the same time this is a serious accusation with no details and little context.This could have been presented in a more organized way, with timelines and redacted content.Part of the problem is Google not being transparent, having more transparency could help.
Is this supposed to be some hypocrisy gotcha? It's a guy's personal blogHe's jotting down his thoughts, not trying to be a review process to distribute software on the most used operating system on the planet
thih9 · · focus · HN ↗
I don’t doubt the author, at the same time this is a serious accusation with no details and little context.
This could have been presented in a more organized way, with timelines and redacted content.
Part of the problem is Google not being transparent, having more transparency could help.
hbn · · focus · HN ↗
He's jotting down his thoughts, not trying to be a review process to distribute software on the most used operating system on the planet