> it was rejected. They attached a nsfw screenshot of some unidentified app.I don’t doubt the author, at the same time this is a serious accusation with no details and little context.This could have been presented in a more organized way, with timelines and redacted content.Part of the problem is Google not being transparent, having more transparency could help.
thih9 · · focus · HN ↗
I don’t doubt the author, at the same time this is a serious accusation with no details and little context.
This could have been presented in a more organized way, with timelines and redacted content.
Part of the problem is Google not being transparent, having more transparency could help.
junon · · focus · HN ↗