Pelicans. Sonnet 5.5 has the same problem as Opus 5.5: on "max" thinking effort it burned through 128,000 thinking tokens (taking 15 minutes to do that) and ran out before it had produced the final SVG.
I can't understand it. Clearly someone cares because like you say the comments are always upvoted. But why anyone cares I simply don't know. It just feels like attention seeking behaviour to continue posting it.
Linking to <a href="https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2Fsimonw%2F1d85a9be7f3ecce26e7f1569161a0d01" rel="nofollow">https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer?url=ht... should be pretty inoffensive (I started habitually linking to that after people kept complaining about linking to my blog) - that page renders Markdown with SVG embedded in it, but doesn't link to the rest of my site at all.
simonw · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2Fsimonw%2F1d85a9be7f3ecce26e7f1569161a0d01" rel="nofollow">https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer?url=ht...
Here's how the thinking effort levels compare:
Low and medium both used 0 thinking tokens.dennisy · · focus · HN ↗
Any model release it’s the top comment, I do not understand why.
mvdtnz · · focus · HN ↗
simonw · · focus · HN ↗
mi_lk · · focus · HN ↗
simonw · · focus · HN ↗