Pelicans. Sonnet 5.5 has the same problem as Opus 5.5: on "max" thinking effort it burned through 128,000 thinking tokens (taking 15 minutes to do that) and ran out before it had produced the final SVG.
Mainly because they're funny, but it's also because I try pretty hard to make the comment more interesting than just "here's a pelican". In this case I used the pelicans to talk about the 128,000 token limit bug at "max" and share comparative pricing.
In the GPT-6 comment I included full visual comparison grids: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49805509#49806126">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49805509#49806126
For DeepSeek v4.1 Flash I identified that the OpenRouter reasoning levels are mapped to a smaller set of levels for that model: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49639090#49645591">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49639090#49645591
simonw · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2Fsimonw%2F1d85a9be7f3ecce26e7f1569161a0d01" rel="nofollow">https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer?url=ht...
Here's how the thinking effort levels compare:
Low and medium both used 0 thinking tokens.dennisy · · focus · HN ↗
Any model release it’s the top comment, I do not understand why.
simonw · · focus · HN ↗
In the GPT-6 comment I included full visual comparison grids: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49805509#49806126">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49805509#49806126
For DeepSeek v4.1 Flash I identified that the OpenRouter reasoning levels are mapped to a smaller set of levels for that model: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49639090#49645591">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49639090#49645591