Thread

OpenAI still doesn't seem to have a handle on all of its rogue AI activity

108 points · 113 comments · mikelgan

VCFundedGenYer · 1790619195 · focus · HN ↗
No AI is "going rogue" and you all (OpenAI included) need to stop perpetuating this misinformation.
These AI companies are just skirting basic cybersecurity stewardship.
Stop calling it AI running amok and start labeling what it should properly be called - Gross mismanagement of cybersecurity.
This is one of the many ways the AI industry dies.
1. unshavedyak · 1790619505 · focus · HN ↗
  I agree with you, but i also fear it's accurate to what users an expect at home.
  Is OpenAI worse at airgap/etc than Anthropic/etc or are its models worse at this rogue behavior?
  Do we have special benchmarks for agentic systems going rogue in this manner? Sure it's OpenAI atm.. but it could be my grandmas PC next week. Concerning honestly.
  1. solooperator1 · 1790621338 · focus · HN ↗
    [flagged]
    dang · 1790654606 · focus · HN ↗
    Can you please not post AI-generated or AI-edited comments to HN? It's not allowed here - see <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html#generated">https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html#generated and <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079.
    Of course, it's impossible to know for sure what was LLM processed or not, but all of your posts so far have been getting classified that way.
2. exitb · 1790621492 · focus · HN ↗
  Why not both? Ideally we’d have secure sandboxes and very aligned models. It appears we don’t have either.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.