‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

How Pew Research Center is – and is not – using AI in our work

13 points · 3 comments · hn_acker

Loading the complete thread in the background. This saved snapshot is available now. Refresh

  1. moronicles · · focus · HN ↗
    That signature "is... and is not..." definition-by-negation of OpenAI models
    1. mattkrause · · focus · HN ↗
      It's also just....decent writing? The article is literally split two sections calling out where they do/do not use AI.
    2. devindotcom · · focus · HN ↗
      this kind of comment is charting fast for most annoying low effort response
    3. EA-3167 · · focus · HN ↗
      Pangram says 100% human and that’s how it reads to me too.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.