Thread

The problem is not AI code, but not knowing about system architecture or intent

388 points · 240 comments · zazuke

chinathrow · 1790612655 · focus · HN ↗
Clicks on blog, sees AI generated template, leaves.
Enough, already.
1. Shank · 1790613184 · focus · HN ↗
  I mean, the content doesn't look AI generated. I couldn't care less if someone AI generates their blog template, the rest of the content seems meaningful.
2. davidclark · 1790613740 · focus · HN ↗
  How humans can differentiate the things they make has been something I’ve been thinking about a bit recently. What markers signal to you this is AI generated?
3. zazuke · 1790614883 · focus · HN ↗
  This page has been live long before AI appeared, I used Quartz [1] v3, now at v5. But added some features I like with AI, yes, but still keeping my beloved color theme and web style as I had it for a long, long time. The whole code for the second brain (ssp.sh/brain/*) is on GitHub, in case you want to check it [2], but you can also see the "Changelog" in the footer to see recent visual changes. But I'd be curious what makes you think it's AI-generated?
  [1] <a href="https://github.com/jackyzha0/quartz" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/jackyzha0/quartz [2] <a href="https://github.com/sspaeti/second-brain-public" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/sspaeti/second-brain-public
  1. chinathrow · 1790619102 · focus · HN ↗
    Apologies.
    The beige coloring with the bright green "recently updated" label somehow triggered my "this template is made by Claude" instinct.
    zazuke · 1790670205 · focus · HN ↗
    good point, thanks for the honesty. I will change that, I think the color inside pop up make sense (red removed, green added words), but the green dot does not add value.
4. senderista · 1790616039 · focus · HN ↗
  Who cares? The writing certainly wasn't AI.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.