Thread

1. beloch · 1790634966 · focus · HN ↗

   Last week, Huang did an interview where he vigorously argued against regulations in the AI sector[1]. He claimed that U.S. companies are really good at regulating themselves, despite evidence to the contrary, and he trusts them not to release anything dangerous. Pay no attention to the fact that regulation might reduce demand for Nvidia's chips, and Nvidia has a direct financial stake in AI companies to boot.

   Apparently he had another solution in mind: More hardware. Don't trust what unregulated corps are doing with Nvidia chips? Here are more Nvidia chips to watch them!

   AI has an undeniable public trust problem. LLM's are getting out of their sandboxes, doing illegal things, and the public has realized AI corporations are playing at dice. CEO's stand to reap the rewards but the public good is on the line if the dice come up snake eyes. People want assurances. Huang wants to sell assurance etched on silicon because that's good for his pocket book. However, does unchanging hardware security really stand a chance at keeping rapidly evolving software in check?

   _________________

   [1]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=HjurAWAr_nY" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=HjurAWAr_nY

   1. Symmetry · 1790684338 · focus · HN ↗

      It was very obvious during the interview that he didn&#x27;t know a lot of basic facts about the Hugging Face breach, which makes sense given that his attitude had been that AI safety was a &quot;loser premise, makes no sense to me.&quot; So it makes sense that after learning about it he goes straight to &quot;I&#x27;m smart, how hard can it be?&quot;.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.