I really dislike this but have to say it is impressive.
To test it I tried "Who Killed Paulina Borsook's Career?" The summary is correct I did not hear any errors.
<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/paulina-borsook-profile/" rel="nofollow">https://www.wired.com/story/paulina-borsook-profile/
<a href="https://hn.watch/?item=49866903" rel="nofollow">https://hn.watch/?item=49866903
It did do what I expected from such a system:
- It removed the fun parts of the article and the way it is written.
- Stated some interpretations as fact without naming the source
Article '"That gunshot prematurely aged my brain,” she said'
Summary 'The impact prematurely aged her brain'
One surprise is did not like: The sharpest concrete thing was a .45 caliber bullet. Feels like some sort of attempt to add original humor and I do not like it.
This is the worst kind of article for this kind of summary and I feel like it really shows the most and least impressive parts of the system.
spoon404 · · focus · HN ↗
To test it I tried "Who Killed Paulina Borsook's Career?" The summary is correct I did not hear any errors. <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/paulina-borsook-profile/" rel="nofollow">https://www.wired.com/story/paulina-borsook-profile/ <a href="https://hn.watch/?item=49866903" rel="nofollow">https://hn.watch/?item=49866903
It did do what I expected from such a system: - It removed the fun parts of the article and the way it is written. - Stated some interpretations as fact without naming the source Article '"That gunshot prematurely aged my brain,” she said' Summary 'The impact prematurely aged her brain'
One surprise is did not like: The sharpest concrete thing was a .45 caliber bullet. Feels like some sort of attempt to add original humor and I do not like it.
This is the worst kind of article for this kind of summary and I feel like it really shows the most and least impressive parts of the system.