Thread

1. temp00345 · 1790609581 · focus · HN ↗

   I read such articles more or less every day. This article would be 100% correct if it came out 1 year ago, 75% correct 9 months ago, 50% correct 3 months ago and it's probably 25% correct now if not less.

   I totally understand where this is coming from. I too am struggling with accepting that my 30+ years of programming experience is quickly becoming obsolete. I'm losing sleep about this, it's tough.

   But just go ahead and give the latest models (Opus 5.5 / Astra 6 as of today) another try. See what they are capable of and read the code which they produce. Any problem area, low level C++ or high level Typescript or Clojure or a weird combination of these..

   Don't be shy, give them a big task, let them build an entire app, UI and all..

   Now compare the output to Opus 4 or gpt-5 from 1 year ago - when they couldn't put together a single function without it being weird and buggy.

   This is exactly my problem, not that the models are very good already, but how fast they got so good. So if coding is not solved yet, it'll get there very soon.

   1. lnkl · 1790611922 · focus · HN ↗

      >This article would be 100% correct if it came out 1 year ago, 75% correct 9 months ago, 50% correct 3 months ago and it's probably 25% correct now if not less.

      Feels like I read comment similar to this one each year since 2023.

      1. throwawayffffas · 1790614847 · focus · HN ↗

         I can tell you it was not correct in January of 2026. The real swift started happening with the latest models opus 4.7, fable 5, kimi k3, glm 5.2.

         That's when the models started to be coherent enough for real work.

         They still fuck up, but it does not feel the code was written by drunk interns anymore.

         1. its_k1r4 · 1790622813 · focus · HN ↗

            [dead]

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.