‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Coding is not solved

584 points · 544 comments · firstSpeaker

  1. askonomm · · focus · HN ↗
    What I've found is that AI allows lazy and incompetent developers to be more lazy and more incompetent. This then has the effect that product quality suffers more, faster. As a result of the sheer amount of code now being pushed out, code reviews, a thing that previously somewhat prevented lazy and incompetent developers from pushing out horrible code, is effectively dead in the water since no human can actually review such amounts of code realistically anymore. Some companies have adopted AI to review code, which, well ... you have AI make code, AI review code ... I hope you can see the stupidity here if you expect to see any deterministic results at all.

    I guess time will tell if the consumer will adapt to the lower quality of products, allowing companies to justify the existence of lazy and incompetent developers, or if the consumer will push back, forcing companies to increase the quality of their developers.

    Note: I use AI every day and it is entirely possible to create high quality software with it, so long as you are not lazy and incompetent.

    1. hanifbbz · · focus · HN ↗
      In other words AI is a multiplier.
      1. rfgplk · · focus · HN ↗
        "optimize this code", "fix this code", "extend this code", "add this feature", "find errors and patch them", "find bugs and fix them", "rewrite this from python to rust".

        This is all that's needed to actually use LLMs nowadays. How is it a "multiplier" rather than an "equalizer"?

        1. sortoflog · · focus · HN ↗
          The skill floor has definitely been lowered, but if this were actually true then firms would be replacing senior software positions with entry level ones, not the other way around.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.