‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Does Reddit have an astroturfing problem? What the data suggests

312 points · 408 comments · p-s-v

  1. smcleod · · focus · HN ↗
    "The corpus, and the refresh that changed the answer" ... hello Opus 5.
    1. spyckie2 · · focus · HN ↗
      My brain at some point refused to read past paragraph 3 and I just felt defeat.

      An article talking about astroturfing but so tone deaf as to not even rewrite its ai generated content to be human readable.

      It truly feels like the dead internet.

      1. tom_ · · focus · HN ↗
        Well done on getting that far. I noped out after the first sentence, and kicked myself for not realising it just based on the title.

        EDIT: oh, hang on, I read some other comments, and it turns out there's an AI disclaimer - and, now I check again, it's true! There is! Well, fair enough then, but I think this disclaimer should come literally right at the start

        1. spyckie2 · · focus · HN ↗
          I'm at the stage where I automatically assume everything as AI assisted, but am still willing to engage if there is some effort to humanize.

          There is less than zero effort on this one. I don't even think the author read the output himself.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.