‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

TabPFN and TabICL vs. tuned XGBoost: the model that doesn't train won 14/14

23 points · 12 comments · EfrainGaray

  1. bronlund · · focus · HN ↗
    This AI slop is tiring.

    Edit: I got downvoted, and it was most likely by the AI slop instigator himself. Imagine being so proud of your slop, that you take it personally when someone critiques it :D

    Now I am curious as to how much of his blog is exactly like this.

    Edit 2: All of it, it seems. Like; that article about Intern-Decision the 26. September 2026. The author installed it, fixed three failures, tested it on 27,256 days of weather, and published the write-up that same day as it was released.

    And then manage to get cranky when someone points it out :D

    Edit 3: Misunderstand me correctly. I'm all in AI, and I produce my fair share of AI slop as well, but it is almost exclusively for internal use and I can't imagine treating it as premium content. And if I felt the need to publish any of it, I would ensure that it was clearly marked; AI generated.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.