Thread

1. whall6 · 1790563728 · focus · HN ↗

   You should sell your right to litigate this. There are hundreds of firms that would pay you to take this on. Would involve near zero effort for you and would also check the box of being “about the principle”.

   1. tgsovlerkhgsel · 1790565382 · focus · HN ↗

      > After much soul-searching, deliberation, and gnashing of teeth, my attorneys and I concluded that the statute of limitations was against us. Because of the thirty-odd years that had passed while I “sat on my rights,” it seemed unlikely we’d make it past a motion to dismiss.

      That was my first thought as well.

      1. edoceo · 1790567812 · focus · HN ↗

         Statue of limitations hasn't started because the acts in 1996 by the company and officers are part of an ongoing conspiracy. Maybe?

         Source: cannabis and Law&Order reruns.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.