‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Show HN: Panda, the world's first personal AI computer

8 points · 54 comments · moezee1

  1. furyofantares · · focus · HN ↗
    The chat UI is duplicating the chatgpt/claude web chats, where you've got a list of chats on the left and each new thing you wanna do is expected to be a new chat, and maybe it has memories it writes to or can search chats to cross reference.

    I've been using these things a bit differently lately, more of a personal assistant - probably more of the OpenClaw setup I'd guess, though I haven't used OpenClaw. I have my macbook running constantly and it has a session running for reach of my projects, plus one session called pa (personal assistant) which is set up to track tasks and to talk to all the other sessions.

    The pa is the only session I directly interact with anymore. It's got it's own Signal account and a single Signal chat is the way I interact with all my sessions. Actually, there are a few sessions run on other machines too that it knows how to get to, but mostly it's just the per-project sessions on my macbook.

    I think that's how I'm gonna want stuff like this to work - mostly in one single text thread that delegates to the others. The others don't have to be totally invisible, being able to drop into them individually would be fine as long as it doesn't interfere with the simplicity of the main thread.

    1. NegativeLatency · · focus · HN ↗
      How do you manage context?

      Not a gotcha, just trying to understand how your setup works

      1. furyofantares · · focus · HN ↗
        So the PA itself isn't really a problem, it mostly just delegates to other sessions and if it has personal assistant-type work to do, it uses subagents. The per-project sessions are also meant to use subagents liberally.

        But the actual answer is just one session per project and auto-compacting. Actually I run into usage limits on both codex and claude max subscriptions and so there is also a fair bit of it having to do codex/claude handoffs which is like a worse auto-compact.

        I am quite sure I get worse results at a higher cost than I do for my actual day job, where I'm taking ownership of code, getting the actual code I want, and therefore doing a lot more manual context management.

        But for side projects and other personal computer usage it's all vibing and auto-compacting.

        1. NegativeLatency · · focus · HN ↗
          So the planner just forgets stuff eventually?
          1. furyofantares · · focus · HN ↗
            Oh - well the planner has a bunch of files it maintains for itself

            logs/ keeps logs of various activities, including a daily unified log of my chats with it + it's messages to/from the other agnets

            notes/ has notes on all the various projects, or any time i have it do research on something it'll keep notes here

            reference/ similar to notes but more for content that has been pulled in externally

            reminders/ stuff it's supposed to remind me about

            scripts/ many different scripts it's written to do all the work it does

            tasks/ open tasks

            tasks/done/ completed tasks

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.