Thread

1. mattmaroon · 1790561684 · focus · HN ↗

   “Linked to” is a keyword indicating pseudoscience. Everything is “linked to cancer”.

   1. rdiddly · 1790562707 · focus · HN ↗

      "Linked to" by having been studied and shown to increase tumor rates in rodent testing. That not good enough for ya? Too pseudo-sciencey?

      1. timr · 1790562881 · focus · HN ↗

         Yes, that’s not good enough. Rodents are not humans. Then you have to deal with the dose, the setting, the difference in healthy lifespan, and a million other factors that differ from actual people in the real world.

         On top of all of that, this paper did no actual research - it just mined existing literature for any chemicals with at least one paper saying that it did something cancer-related in mice or other assays.

         Based on prior experience, almost certainly a substantial proportion of these papers are crap, but they don’t make any effort to figure that out (because that would be science, and therefore hard.)

         1. abisheakp197 · 1790562893 · focus · HN ↗

            You are right

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.