‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Booted up in 1993, this server still runs – but not for much longer (2017)

193 points · 110 comments · doener

  1. api · · focus · HN ↗
    I wonder if doing this to hardware would have overall been cheaper than doing the baroque Rube Goldberg shit we do to software to make it somewhat kind of fault tolerant… or at least convince ourselves it is.

    (You can write real fault tolerant software but a wad of tangled crap and hidden dependencies crammed into Kubernetes is not it.)

    1. advisedwang · · focus · HN ↗
      Fault tolerance is expensive, even when it's a single box. This kind of hardware is the wrong tool for the job because most use cases can tolerate some downtime and it's not worth paying 10x cost to get a few nines you don't need.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.